Xeon 6731E vs i3-7310U
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| Release date | 4 July 2017 (8 years ago) | 3 June 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $4,121 |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-7310U and Xeon 6731E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 96 |
| Threads | 4 | 96 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
| Bus type | OPI | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 27 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 4 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 3 nm |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 84 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-7310U and Xeon 6731E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | no data | FCLGA4710 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7310U and Xeon 6731E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Core i3-7310U and Xeon 6731E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| SGX | no data | + |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7310U and Xeon 6731E are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7310U and Xeon 6731E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR5-6400 |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 4 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 8 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 620 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7310U and Xeon 6731E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 88 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 July 2017 | 3 June 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 96 |
| Threads | 4 | 96 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 250 Watt |
i3-7310U has 1566.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon 6731E, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and 4700% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core i3-7310U and Intel Xeon 6731E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i3-7310U is a notebook processor while Xeon 6731E is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
