Ryzen 3 3200G vs i3-7120
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-7120 and Ryzen 3 3200G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 1283 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 31 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 8.90 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core i3 | AMD Ryzen 3 |
Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
Release date | 17 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 12 June 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $117 | $99 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-7120 and Ryzen 3 3200G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
Bus type | DMI 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 40 | 36 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Die size | no data | 209.78 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | no data | 4940 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-7120 and Ryzen 3 3200G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | 1151 | AM4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7120 and Ryzen 3 3200G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7120 and Ryzen 3 3200G are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7120 and Ryzen 3 3200G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4 Dual-channel |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | 46.933 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7120 and Ryzen 3 3200G.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 3.10 | 4.50 |
Recency | 17 July 2017 | 12 June 2019 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 12 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 65 Watt |
i3-7120 has 27.5% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 3 3200G, on the other hand, has 45.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-7120 and Ryzen 3 3200G. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7120 and Ryzen 3 3200G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.