Xeon 6780E vs i3-7102E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7102E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.48
Xeon 6780E
2024
144 cores / 144 threads, 330 Watt
49.35
+3234%

Xeon 6780E outperforms Core i3-7102E by a whopping 3234% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking231445
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.141.28
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency2.506.32
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Sierra Forest (2024)
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)3 June 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$11,350

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon 6780E has 814% better value for money than i3-7102E.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7102E and Xeon 6780E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)144
Threads4144
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache128 KB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB4 MB (per module)
L3 cache3 MB108 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7102E and Xeon 6780E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
Socketno dataFCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt330 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7102E and Xeon 6780E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-7102E and Xeon 6780E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7102E and Xeon 6780E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7102E and Xeon 6780E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR5-6400
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 630N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7102E and Xeon 6780E.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1688

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i3-7102E 1.48
Xeon 6780E 49.35
+3234%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i3-7102E 2599
Samples: 2
Xeon 6780E 86734
+3237%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 49.35
Recency 3 January 2017 3 June 2024
Physical cores 2 144
Threads 4 144
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 330 Watt

i3-7102E has 1220% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6780E, on the other hand, has a 3234.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, and 7100% more physical cores and 3500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6780E is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-7102E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-7102E is a notebook processor while Xeon 6780E is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7102E
Core i3-7102E
Intel Xeon 6780E
Xeon 6780E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-7102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 18 votes

Rate Xeon 6780E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-7102E and Xeon 6780E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.