Celeron N5095A vs i3-7101E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7101E
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 54 Watt
2.89
+7.4%

Core i3-7101E outperforms Celeron N5095A by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16751717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.05no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency4.8816.35
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Jasper Lake (2021)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)1 July 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$117no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.9 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier39no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache3 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151BGA1338
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vProno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection++
SGXYes with Intel® ME-
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600, DDR4-2400DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB16 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630Intel UHD Graphics
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHz750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data16
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDP++
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support++
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212
OpenGL4.54.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes168
USB revisionno data2.0/3.2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data14
Integrated LANno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7101E 2.89
+7.4%
Celeron N5095A 2.69

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7101E 4430
+7.6%
Celeron N5095A 4118

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.89 2.69
Integrated graphics card 3.10 5.57
Recency 3 January 2017 1 July 2021
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 15 Watt

i3-7101E has a 7.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N5095A, on the other hand, has 79.7% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 260% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7101E and Celeron N5095A, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7101E
Core i3-7101E
Intel Celeron N5095A
Celeron N5095A

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Core i3-7101E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 97 votes

Rate Celeron N5095A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7101E or Celeron N5095A, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.