Core i7-13700H vs Core i3-7100U

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i3-7100U
2016
2 cores / 4 threads
1.76

Core i7-13700H outperforms Core i3-7100U by a whopping 909% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1912310
Place by popularitynot in top-10094
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Raptor Lake-H
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Raptor Lake-H
Release date30 August 2016 (7 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$281no data
Current price$424 (1.5x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5 GHz
Bus support4 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1356,FPBGA1356FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP-no data
Smart Response+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Key++
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GB96 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 620Intel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Max video memory32 GBno data
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHz1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported34
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hz4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX1212.1
OpenGL4.54.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1228

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7100U 1.76
i7-13700H 17.75
+909%

Core i7-13700H outperforms Core i3-7100U by 909% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-7100U 2723
i7-13700H 27452
+908%

Core i7-13700H outperforms Core i3-7100U by 908% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

i3-7100U 3874
i7-13700H 10487
+171%

Core i7-13700H outperforms Core i3-7100U by 171% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-7100U 8758
i7-13700H 65623
+649%

Core i7-13700H outperforms Core i3-7100U by 649% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

i3-7100U 20.25
i7-13700H 2.94
+589%

Core i3-7100U outperforms Core i7-13700H by 589% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

i3-7100U 3
i7-13700H 34
+1087%

Core i7-13700H outperforms Core i3-7100U by 1087% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-7100U 257
i7-13700H 2496
+873%

Core i7-13700H outperforms Core i3-7100U by 873% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-7100U 95
i7-13700H 269
+183%

Core i7-13700H outperforms Core i3-7100U by 183% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

i3-7100U 1.03
i7-13700H 3.28
+218%

Core i7-13700H outperforms Core i3-7100U by 218% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.76 17.75
Recency 30 August 2016 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

The Core i7-13700H is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-7100U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7100U and Core i7-13700H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7100U
Core i3-7100U
Intel Core i7-13700H
Core i7-13700H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 383 votes

Rate Core i3-7100U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 679 votes

Rate Core i7-13700H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7100U or Core i7-13700H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.