Pro A8-8600B vs Core i3-7100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-7100
2017
2 cores / 4 threads, 51 Watt
2.80
+97.2%

i3-7100 outperforms Pro A8-8600B by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-7100 and Pro A8-8600B processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking16532167
Place by popularity94not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.56no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Carrizo
Architecture codenameKaby Lake (2016−2019)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$117no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-7100 and Pro A8-8600B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.9 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplier39no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-7100 and Pro A8-8600B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socket1151FP4 BGA
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt12-35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7100 and Pro A8-8600B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
HSAno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7100 and Pro A8-8600B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 630AMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7100 and Pro A8-8600B.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-7100 2.80
+97.2%
Pro A8-8600B 1.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-7100 4326
+97.5%
Pro A8-8600B 2190

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-7100 1278
+178%
Pro A8-8600B 459

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-7100 2496
+134%
Pro A8-8600B 1067

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.80 1.42
Integrated graphics card 3.10 1.47
Recency 3 January 2017 3 June 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 12 Watt

i3-7100 has a 97.2% higher aggregate performance score, 110.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pro A8-8600B, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 325% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-7100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pro A8-8600B in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-7100 is a desktop processor while Pro A8-8600B is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7100 and Pro A8-8600B, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-7100
Core i3-7100
AMD Pro A8-8600B
Pro A8-8600B

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1835 votes

Rate Core i3-7100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 46 votes

Rate Pro A8-8600B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-7100 or Pro A8-8600B, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.