i7-2667M vs i3-7007U
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-7007U and Core i7-2667M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i3 | Intel Core i7 |
Architecture codename | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | no data (2024 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-7007U and Core i7-2667M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Boost clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Bus type | OPI | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | 4 GT/s | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | 21 | 18 |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 3 MB | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Number of transistors | no data | 624 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-7007U and Core i7-2667M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | no data | Socket G2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-7007U and Core i7-2667M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i3-7007U and Core i7-2667M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-7007U and Core i7-2667M are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-7007U and Core i7-2667M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR3-1333 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 620 | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-7007U and Core i7-2667M.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 2.42 | 0.66 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 35 Watt |
i3-7007U has 266.7% faster integrated GPU, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-7007U and Core i7-2667M. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-7007U and Core i7-2667M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.