EPYC 7313P vs i3-6320T
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 230 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 21.38 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | no data | 16.11 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| Release date | 9 May 2016 (9 years ago) | 15 March 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $913 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i3-6320T and EPYC 7313P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.7 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | no data | 30 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm+ |
| Die size | 98.57 mm2 | 4x 81 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 16,600 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-6320T and EPYC 7313P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | LGA-1151 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 155 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6320T and EPYC 7313P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6320T and EPYC 7313P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6320T and EPYC 7313P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3L-1600 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 4 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 204.795 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 530 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6320T and EPYC 7313P.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 128 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 9 May 2016 | 15 March 2021 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 16 |
| Threads | 4 | 32 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 155 Watt |
i3-6320T has 342.9% lower power consumption.
EPYC 7313P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core i3-6320T and AMD EPYC 7313P. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-6320T is a desktop processor while EPYC 7313P is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
