Core i3-1000G1 vs Core i3-6320
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-6320 and Core i3-1000G1 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1625 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.55 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core i3 | Intel Ice Lake |
Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Ice Lake (Client) (2019) |
Release date | 1 September 2015 (8 years ago) | 1 August 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $157 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-6320 and Core i3-1000G1 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.1 GHz |
Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 4 GT/s |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 98.57 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-6320 and Core i3-1000G1 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | 1151 | Intel BGA1440 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 9 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6320 and Core i3-1000G1. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | no data | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6320 and Core i3-1000G1 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6320 and Core i3-1000G1. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 59.732 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 530 | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6320 and Core i3-1000G1.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 2.59 | 3.05 |
Recency | 1 September 2015 | 1 August 2019 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 51 Watt | 9 Watt |
i3-1000G1 has 17.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 466.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-6320 and Core i3-1000G1. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-6320 is a desktop processor while Core i3-1000G1 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6320 and Core i3-1000G1, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.