Celeron N6211 vs i3-6102E

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-6102E
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.48
+5%
Celeron N6211
2022
2 cores / 2 threads, 6 Watt
1.41

Core i3-6102E outperforms Celeron N6211 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6102E and Celeron N6211 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21542197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.083.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3Elkhart Lake
Power efficiency5.6020.53
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Elkhart Lake (2022)
Release date12 October 2015 (9 years ago)17 July 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$54

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron N6211 has 4063% better value for money than i3-6102E.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6102E and Celeron N6211 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.9 GHz3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier19no data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size98.57 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Number of transistors1750 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6102E and Celeron N6211 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
Socketno dataBGA1493
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt6.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6102E and Celeron N6211. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6102E and Celeron N6211 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6102E and Celeron N6211. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesLPDDR3-1866DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6102E and Celeron N6211.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-6102E 1.48
+5%
Celeron N6211 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-6102E 2349
+4.6%
Celeron N6211 2245

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 1.41
Integrated graphics card 2.60 1.39
Recency 12 October 2015 17 July 2022
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 6 Watt

i3-6102E has a 5% higher aggregate performance score, 87.1% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.

Celeron N6211, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-6102E and Celeron N6211.

Be aware that Core i3-6102E is a notebook processor while Celeron N6211 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6102E and Celeron N6211, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6102E
Core i3-6102E
Intel Celeron N6211
Celeron N6211

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate Core i3-6102E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 4 votes

Rate Celeron N6211 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6102E or Celeron N6211, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.