Athlon X4 840 vs Core i3-6100TE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-6100TE
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.04
Athlon X4 840
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
2.15
+5.4%

Athlon X4 840 outperforms i3-6100TE by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6100TE and Athlon X4 840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18281782
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.137.38
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i34x Athlon
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date12 October 2015 (8 years ago)August 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$117no data
Current price$354 (3x MSRP)$23

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon X4 840 has 5577% better value for money than i3-6100TE.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6100TE and Athlon X4 840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KB256K
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm245 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistorsno data2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6100TE and Athlon X4 840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketLGA-1151Socket FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6100TE and Athlon X4 840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6100TE and Athlon X4 840 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6100TE and Athlon X4 840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3L-1600DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 530no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6100TE and Athlon X4 840.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-6100TE 2.04
Athlon X4 840 2.15
+5.4%

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Core i3-6100TE by 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-6100TE 3152
Athlon X4 840 3319
+5.3%

Athlon X4 840 outperforms Core i3-6100TE by 5% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.04 2.15
Recency 12 October 2015 on August 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-6100TE and Athlon X4 840.

Be aware that Core i3-6100TE is a notebook processor while Athlon X4 840 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6100TE and Athlon X4 840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6100TE
Core i3-6100TE
AMD Athlon X4 840
Athlon X4 840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Core i3-6100TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 577 votes

Rate Athlon X4 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6100TE or Athlon X4 840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.