i3-8100F vs i3-6100E
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-6100E and Core i3-8100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1915 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.24 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | Intel Core i3 |
| Power efficiency | 5.64 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (2015−2016) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 12 October 2015 (9 years ago) | 1 September 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $225 | $117 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-6100E and Core i3-8100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 27 | 36 |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 98.57 mm2 | 126 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1750 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-6100E and Core i3-8100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | 1151 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6100E and Core i3-8100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| TSX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6100E and Core i3-8100F are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6100E and Core i3-8100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | LPDDR3-1866 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 34.134 GB/s | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 530 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6100E and Core i3-8100F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 October 2015 | 1 September 2018 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
i3-6100E has 85.7% lower power consumption.
i3-8100F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 100% more physical cores.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-6100E and Core i3-8100F. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i3-6100E is a notebook processor while Core i3-8100F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6100E and Core i3-8100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
