Celeron J1750 vs i3-6100

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-6100
2015
2 cores / 4 threads, 51 Watt
2.69
+627%
Celeron J1750
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.37

Core i3-6100 outperforms Celeron J1750 by a whopping 627% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17043019
Place by popularity89not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.73no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency4.993.50
Architecture codenameSkylake (2015−2016)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date1 September 2015 (9 years ago)1 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$117$72

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.41 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.41 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache64K (per core)112 KB
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm22 nm
Die size150 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA1151FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth34.134 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 530Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz750 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGAN/Ano data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-6100 2.69
+627%
Celeron J1750 0.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-6100 4270
+618%
Celeron J1750 595

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.69 0.37
Integrated graphics card 2.59 0.77
Recency 1 September 2015 1 September 2013
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 10 Watt

i3-6100 has a 627% higher aggregate performance score, 236.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron J1750, on the other hand, has 410% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-6100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1750 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-6100 is a desktop processor while Celeron J1750 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-6100 and Celeron J1750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-6100
Core i3-6100
Intel Celeron J1750
Celeron J1750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1503 votes

Rate Core i3-6100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 4 votes

Rate Celeron J1750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-6100 or Celeron J1750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.