EPYC 9354P vs Core i3-550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-550
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 73 Watt
1.04
EPYC 9354P
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
49.36
+4646%

EPYC 9354P outperforms i3-550 by a whopping 4646% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-550 and EPYC 9354P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking239332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0714.16
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameClarkdale (2010−2011)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date30 May 2010 (14 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$101$2,730

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 9354P has 20129% better value for money than i3-550.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-550 and EPYC 9354P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.25 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.25 GHz
Multiplierno data32.5
L1 cache64 KB (per core)2 MB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)32 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size81 mm28x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °Cno data
Number of transistors382 million52,560 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-550 and EPYC 9354P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156SP5
Power consumption (TDP)73 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-550 and EPYC 9354P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-550 and EPYC 9354P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-550 and EPYC 9354P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-550 and EPYC 9354P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size16.38 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s460.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video HD+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-550 and EPYC 9354P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-550 and EPYC 9354P.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-550 1.04
EPYC 9354P 49.36
+4646%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-550 1608
EPYC 9354P 76338
+4647%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-550 425
EPYC 9354P 1403
+230%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-550 865
EPYC 9354P 11992
+1286%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.04 49.36
Recency 30 May 2010 10 November 2022
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 73 Watt 280 Watt

i3-550 has 283.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9354P, on the other hand, has a 4646.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9354P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-550 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-550 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9354P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-550 and EPYC 9354P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-550
Core i3-550
AMD EPYC 9354P
EPYC 9354P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 414 votes

Rate Core i3-550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9354P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-550 or EPYC 9354P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.