Pentium D 830 vs i3-530
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-530 outperforms Pentium D 830 by a whopping 169% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-530 and Pentium D 830 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2534 | 3070 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.14 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.23 | 0.26 |
| Architecture codename | Clarkdale (2010−2011) | Smithfield (2005) |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 (15 years ago) | May 2005 (19 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $60 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-530 and Pentium D 830 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 0.93 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 2.5 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 28 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | 206 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | 70 °C |
| Number of transistors | 382 million | 169 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.65V-1.4V | 1.2V-1.4V |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-530 and Pentium D 830 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA1156 | PLGA775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-530 and Pentium D 830. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| vPro | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | 36 Bit | 32 Bit |
| FDI | + | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-530 and Pentium D 830 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-530 and Pentium D 830 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | - |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-530 and Pentium D 830. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 16.38 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processors | no data |
| Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-530 and Pentium D 830 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 2 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-530 and Pentium D 830.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.94 | 0.35 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 73 Watt | 130 Watt |
i3-530 has a 168.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, a 181.3% more advanced lithography process, and 78.1% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-530 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium D 830 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-530 and Pentium D 830, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
