Celeron N2810 vs i3-4370

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4370
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 54 Watt
2.43
+913%
Celeron N2810
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 7 Watt
0.24

Core i3-4370 outperforms Celeron N2810 by a whopping 913% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17723180
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.30no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency4.243.23
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date21 July 2014 (10 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$242$260

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography22 nm22 nm
Die size177 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt7.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600Intel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+-
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHz756 MHz
InTru 3D+-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported32
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes164
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4370 2.43
+913%
Celeron N2810 0.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4370 3867
+926%
Celeron N2810 377

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-4370 1230
+715%
Celeron N2810 151

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-4370 2401
+776%
Celeron N2810 274

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 0.24
Integrated graphics card 1.84 0.77
Recency 21 July 2014 11 September 2013
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 7 Watt

i3-4370 has a 912.5% higher aggregate performance score, 139% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 10 months, and 100% more threads.

Celeron N2810, on the other hand, has 671.4% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-4370 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2810 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-4370 is a desktop processor while Celeron N2810 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4370 and Celeron N2810, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4370
Core i3-4370
Intel Celeron N2810
Celeron N2810

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 45 votes

Rate Core i3-4370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 41 vote

Rate Celeron N2810 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4370 or Celeron N2810, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.