Xeon W3520 vs i3-4330

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4330
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 54 Watt
2.21
+20.1%
Xeon W3520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.84

Core i3-4330 outperforms Xeon W3520 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18462004
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.350.32
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency3.871.34
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Bloomfield (2008−2010)
Release date1 September 2013 (11 years ago)30 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$171$404

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-4330 has 9% better value for money than Xeon W3520.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz2.93 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm45 nm
Die size177 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-1.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data36 Bit

Security technologies

Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GB24 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600N/A
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12no data
OpenGL4.3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520.

PCIe versionUp to 3.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4330 2.21
+20.1%
Xeon W3520 1.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4330 3510
+20.2%
Xeon W3520 2920

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-4330 1059
+156%
Xeon W3520 413

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-4330 2084
+46.7%
Xeon W3520 1421

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.21 1.84
Recency 1 September 2013 30 March 2009
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 130 Watt

i3-4330 has a 20.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 140.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon W3520, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i3-4330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3520 in performance tests.

Note that Core i3-4330 is a desktop processor while Xeon W3520 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4330 and Xeon W3520, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4330
Core i3-4330
Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 220 votes

Rate Core i3-4330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 120 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4330 or Xeon W3520, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.