A8-7650K vs i3-4160

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4160
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 54 Watt
2.21
+12.2%
A8-7650K
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.97

Core i3-4160 outperforms A8-7650K by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18301930
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.360.24
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD A-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency3.871.96
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date21 July 2014 (10 years ago)7 January 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$133$152

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i3-4160 has 50% better value for money than A8-7650K.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4096 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size177 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,400 million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1150FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)54 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2SSE1-4a, AVX, AES, FMA4, VT
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
DualGraphics-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-2133
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4400AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Number of pipelinesno data384
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
DVI+no data
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@24Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA1920x1200@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.1/12DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.3no data
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K.

PCIe versionUp to 3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4160 2.21
+12.2%
A8-7650K 1.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4160 3518
+12.6%
A8-7650K 3123

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-4160 1077
+156%
A8-7650K 420

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-4160 2083
+100%
A8-7650K 1041

3DMark Fire Strike Physics

i3-4160 5100
+50.4%
A8-7650K 3390

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.21 1.97
Recency 21 July 2014 7 January 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 54 Watt 95 Watt

i3-4160 has a 12.2% higher aggregate performance score, a 27.3% more advanced lithography process, and 75.9% lower power consumption.

A8-7650K, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 months, and 100% more physical cores.

The Core i3-4160 is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7650K in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4160 and A8-7650K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4160
Core i3-4160
AMD A8-7650K
A8-7650K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 893 votes

Rate Core i3-4160 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 190 votes

Rate A8-7650K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4160 or A8-7650K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.