A8-7200P vs i3-4110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4110M
2014
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.69
+24.3%
A8-7200P
2014
4 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.36

Core i3-4110M outperforms A8-7200P by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20642252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Kaveri
Power efficiency4.323.68
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date14 April 2014 (10 years ago)4 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB4096 KB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography22 nm28 nm
Die size130 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C102 °C
Number of transistors960 Million2410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCPGA946FP3
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX286x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-

Security technologies

Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1866
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4600AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
iGPU core countno data4
Max video memory2 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort++
HDMI++
VGA+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.43840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort3840x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over VGA2880x1800@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX11.2/12DirectX® 12
OpenGL4.3no data
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P.

PCIe version23.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4110M 1.69
+24.3%
A8-7200P 1.36

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4110M 2678
+24.3%
A8-7200P 2154

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.69 1.36
Recency 14 April 2014 4 June 2014
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 22 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 35 Watt

i3-4110M has a 24.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

A8-7200P, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 month, 100% more physical cores, and 5.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-4110M is our recommended choice as it beats the A8-7200P in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4110M and A8-7200P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4110M
Core i3-4110M
AMD A8-7200P
A8-7200P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Core i3-4110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate A8-7200P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4110M or A8-7200P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.