Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 vs i3-4102E
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-4102E and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core i3 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Haswell (2013−2015) | Strix Halo (2025) |
| Release date | 4 September 2013 (11 years ago) | 6 January 2025 (recently) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $225 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-4102E and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 32 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 118 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,400 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-4102E and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA1364 | FP11 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 55 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4102E and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4102E and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4102E and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD Graphics 4600 (400 - 900 MHz) | Radeon 8050S |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4102E and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 4 September 2013 | 6 January 2025 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 55 Watt |
i3-4102E has 120% lower power consumption.
Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 450% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-4102E and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4102E and Ryzen AI Max PRO 385, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
