i5-13600KF vs i3-4100E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-4100E
2013
2 cores / 4 threads, 37 Watt
1.19
Core i5-13600KF
2022
14 cores / 20 threads, 125 Watt
24.45
+1955%

i5-13600KF outperforms i3-4100E by a whopping 1955% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-4100E and Core i5-13600KF processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2320195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data66.29
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i5
Architecture codenameHaswell (2013−2015)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date1 October 2013 (10 years ago)27 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225$294

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-4100E and Core i5-13600KF basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Threads420
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 4.0
Bus rateno data4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache128 KB768 KB
L2 cache512 KB8 MB
L3 cache3 MB6 MB
Chip lithography22 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size130 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors960 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-4100E and Core i5-13600KF compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1364FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)37 Watt125 W, 181 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-4100E and Core i5-13600KF. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Statusno dataLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-4100E and Core i5-13600KF technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-4100E and Core i5-13600KF are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-4100E and Core i5-13600KF. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data192 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.604 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 4600no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-4100E and Core i5-13600KF.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-4100E 1.19
i5-13600KF 24.45
+1955%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-4100E 1848
i5-13600KF 37819
+1946%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 24.45
Recency 1 October 2013 27 September 2022
Physical cores 2 14
Threads 4 20
Power consumption (TDP) 37 Watt 125 Watt

i3-4100E has 237.8% lower power consumption.

i5-13600KF, on the other hand, has a 1954.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and 600% more physical cores and 400% more threads.

The Core i5-13600KF is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-4100E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-4100E is a notebook processor while Core i5-13600KF is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-4100E and Core i5-13600KF, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-4100E
Core i3-4100E
Intel Core i5-13600KF
Core i5-13600KF

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 3 votes

Rate Core i3-4100E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 1741 vote

Rate Core i5-13600KF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-4100E or Core i5-13600KF, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.