Sempron 150 vs i3-380UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-380UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.47
+23.7%
Sempron 150
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 45 Watt
0.38

Core i3-380UM outperforms Sempron 150 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-380UM and Sempron 150 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29313035
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Power efficiency2.470.80
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Sargas (2009−2011)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)7 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$73

Detailed specifications

Core i3-380UM and Sempron 150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.33 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81+114 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million234 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-380UM and Sempron 150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketBGA1288AM3
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-380UM and Sempron 150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-380UM and Sempron 150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-380UM and Sempron 150 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-380UM and Sempron 150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-380UM and Sempron 150 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-380UM and Sempron 150.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-380UM 0.47
+23.7%
Sempron 150 0.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-380UM 745
+24.8%
Sempron 150 597

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.38
Recency 1 October 2010 7 December 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 45 Watt

i3-380UM has a 23.7% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

Sempron 150, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

The Core i3-380UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 150 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-380UM is a notebook processor while Sempron 150 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-380UM and Sempron 150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-380UM
Core i3-380UM
AMD Sempron 150
Sempron 150

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 8 votes

Rate Core i3-380UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Sempron 150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-380UM or Sempron 150, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.