Athlon II Neo K125 vs i3-380UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-380UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.47
+135%
Athlon II Neo K125
2010
1 core / 1 thread, 12 Watt
0.20

Core i3-380UM outperforms Athlon II Neo K125 by a whopping 135% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-380UM and Athlon II Neo K125 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29303235
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Athlon II Neo
Power efficiency2.471.58
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Geneva (2010)
Release date1 October 2010 (14 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-380UM and Athlon II Neo K125 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed1.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.03 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s2000 MHz
Multiplier10no data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB1 MB
L3 cache3 MBno data
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81+114 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-380UM and Athlon II Neo K125 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketBGA1288S1
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-380UM and Athlon II Neo K125. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2MMX, 3dDNow!, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization
FMA+-
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-380UM and Athlon II Neo K125 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-380UM and Athlon II Neo K125 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-380UM and Athlon II Neo K125. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-380UM and Athlon II Neo K125 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-380UM and Athlon II Neo K125.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-380UM 0.47
+135%
Athlon II Neo K125 0.20

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-380UM 745
+137%
Athlon II Neo K125 315

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-380UM 208
+13%
Athlon II Neo K125 184

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-380UM 471
+156%
Athlon II Neo K125 184

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-380UM 1502
+0.7%
Athlon II Neo K125 1491

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-380UM 1463
+99%
Athlon II Neo K125 735

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i3-380UM 40.53
+124%
Athlon II Neo K125 90.7

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i3-380UM 1
+147%
Athlon II Neo K125 0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.47 0.20
Recency 1 October 2010 12 May 2010
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 12 Watt

i3-380UM has a 135% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon II Neo K125, on the other hand, has 50% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-380UM is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II Neo K125 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-380UM and Athlon II Neo K125, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-380UM
Core i3-380UM
AMD Athlon II Neo K125
Athlon II Neo K125

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 8 votes

Rate Core i3-380UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 21 vote

Rate Athlon II Neo K125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-380UM or Athlon II Neo K125, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.