i5-2537M vs i3-380M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-380M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.76
Core i5-2537M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.77
+1.3%

Core i5-2537M outperforms Core i3-380M by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26632647
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i5
Power efficiency2.054.29
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date26 October 2010 (14 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49$250

Detailed specifications

Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.53 GHz1.4 GHz
Boost clock speed0.53 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 2.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplier1914
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million624 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA1288,PGA988BGA1023,FCBGA1023
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA++
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Identity Protection-+
Anti-Theftno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB8.01 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsIntel HD Graphics 3000
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency667 MHz900 MHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
SDVOno data+
CRTno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-380M 0.76
i5-2537M 0.77
+1.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-380M 1200
i5-2537M 1223
+1.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-380M 330
+7.5%
i5-2537M 307

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-380M 650
+11.5%
i5-2537M 583

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

i3-380M 2808
i5-2537M 2814
+0.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

i3-380M 6554
+11%
i5-2537M 5903

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

i3-380M 2699
+12.5%
i5-2537M 2400

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

i3-380M 20
+24.5%
i5-2537M 24.9

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i3-380M 2
+24.6%
i5-2537M 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 0.77
Integrated graphics card 0.77 0.66
Recency 26 October 2010 1 February 2011
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 17 Watt

i3-380M has 16.7% faster integrated GPU.

i5-2537M, on the other hand, has a 1.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 months, and 105.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-380M and Core i5-2537M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-380M
Core i3-380M
Intel Core i5-2537M
Core i5-2537M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 469 votes

Rate Core i3-380M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate Core i5-2537M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-380M or Core i5-2537M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.