Xeon E5502 vs Core i3-370M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-370M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.75
+38.9%

i3-370M outperforms Xeon E5502 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-370M and Xeon E5502 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26182799
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Gainestown (2009−2010)
Release date22 June 2010 (14 years ago)30 March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$245$95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-370M and Xeon E5502 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz1.87 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier18no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size81+114 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA76 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-370M and Xeon E5502 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketPGA988FCLGA1366,PLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-370M and Xeon E5502. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAE36 Bit40 Bit
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-370M and Xeon E5502 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-370M and Xeon E5502 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-370M and Xeon E5502. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size8 GB144 GB
Max memory channels23
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s19.2 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsN/A
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-370M and Xeon E5502 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-370M and Xeon E5502.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-370M 0.75
+38.9%
Xeon E5502 0.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-370M 1156
+38.1%
Xeon E5502 837

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.75 0.54
Recency 22 June 2010 30 March 2009
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

i3-370M has a 38.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-370M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5502 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-370M is a notebook processor while Xeon E5502 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-370M and Xeon E5502, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-370M
Core i3-370M
Intel Xeon E5502
Xeon E5502

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 494 votes

Rate Core i3-370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5502 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-370M or Xeon E5502, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.