i5-8400T vs i3-370M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-370M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.76
Core i5-8400T
2018
6 cores / 6 threads, 35 Watt
4.87
+541%

Core i5-8400T outperforms Core i3-370M by a whopping 541% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26701267
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data4.90
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Core i5
Power efficiency1.9812.69
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date22 June 2010 (14 years ago)2 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$245$182

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads46
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1817
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB1.5 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)9 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA988FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s42.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD++
Graphics max frequency667 MHz1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported23

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@24Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-370M 0.76
i5-8400T 4.87
+541%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-370M 1156
i5-8400T 7446
+544%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-370M 319
i5-8400T 1110
+248%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-370M 637
i5-8400T 3932
+517%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.76 4.87
Recency 22 June 2010 2 April 2018
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 6
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm

i5-8400T has a 540.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 200% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Core i5-8400T is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-370M is a notebook processor while Core i5-8400T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-370M and Core i5-8400T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-370M
Core i3-370M
Intel Core i5-8400T
Core i5-8400T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 506 votes

Rate Core i3-370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 95 votes

Rate Core i5-8400T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-370M or Core i5-8400T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.