Celeron U3600 vs i3-370M

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2670not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency1.98no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date22 June 2010 (14 years ago)11 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$245no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0DMI 1.0
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/s1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplier189
L1 cache128 KB128 KB
L2 cache512 KB512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size81+114 mm281 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA105 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Million382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPGA988BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
FMA++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
FDI++
Fast Memory Access++

Security technologies

Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-800
Maximum memory size8 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth17.051 GB/s12.799 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® ProcessorsIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHz500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported22

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-370M 1156
+99.7%
Celeron U3600 579

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 June 2010 11 January 2011
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 18 Watt

i3-370M has 100% more threads.

Celeron U3600, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 94.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-370M and Celeron U3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-370M
Core i3-370M
Intel Celeron U3600
Celeron U3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 506 votes

Rate Core i3-370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-370M or Celeron U3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.