Xeon w9-3495X vs Core i3-350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-350M
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.70
Xeon w9-3495X
2023
56 cores / 112 threads, 350 Watt
59.07
+8339%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Core i3-350M by a whopping 8339% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-350M and Xeon w9-3495X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking260917
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Sapphire Rapids
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)1 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$130no data
Current price$123 (0.9x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-350M and Xeon w9-3495X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)56 (Hexapentaconta-Core)
Threads4112
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed0.27 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus support2500 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)105 MB
Chip lithography32 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size81+114 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C for rPGA, 105 °C for BGA81 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-350M and Xeon w9-3495X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketBGA1288,PGA988FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt350 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-350M and Xeon w9-3495X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data+
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Core i3-350M and Xeon w9-3495X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-350M and Xeon w9-3495X are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-350M and Xeon w9-3495X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size8 GB4 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth17.1 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency667 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-350M and Xeon w9-3495X integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-350M and Xeon w9-3495X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanes16112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-350M 0.70
Xeon w9-3495X 59.07
+8339%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Core i3-350M by 8339% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-350M 1084
Xeon w9-3495X 91358
+8328%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Core i3-350M by 8328% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-350M 294
Xeon w9-3495X 2087
+610%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Core i3-350M by 610% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-350M 600
Xeon w9-3495X 18925
+3054%

Xeon w9-3495X outperforms Core i3-350M by 3054% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 59.07
Recency 7 January 2010 1 January 2023
Physical cores 2 56
Threads 4 112
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 350 Watt

The Xeon w9-3495X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-350M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-350M is a notebook processor while Xeon w9-3495X is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-350M and Xeon w9-3495X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-350M
Core i3-350M
Intel Xeon w9-3495X
Xeon w9-3495X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 239 votes

Rate Core i3-350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 176 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3495X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-350M or Xeon w9-3495X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.