Ryzen 5 PRO 220 vs i3-330UM

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-330UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.31
Ryzen 5 PRO 220
2025
6 cores / 12 threads, 6 Watt
11.28
+3539%

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 outperforms Core i3-330UM by a whopping 3539% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3353787
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4 + Zen 4c) (2023−2025)
Release date24 May 2010 (15 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-330UM and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier9no data
L1 cache128 KB384 KB
L2 cache512 KB6 MB
L3 cache3 MB16 MB
Chip lithography32 nm4 nm
Die size81+114 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C100 °C
Number of transistors382+177 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-330UM and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketBGA1288FP7/FP7r2
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt6 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-330UM and Ryzen 5 PRO 220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-330UM and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-330UM and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-330UM and Ryzen 5 PRO 220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon 740M ( - 2800 MHz)
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-330UM and Ryzen 5 PRO 220 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-330UM and Ryzen 5 PRO 220.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i3-330UM 0.31
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 11.28
+3539%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i3-330UM 543
Samples: 56
Ryzen 5 PRO 220 19889
+3563%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 11.28
Integrated graphics card 0.72 7.28
Recency 24 May 2010 6 January 2025
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 32 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 6 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 220 has a 3538.7% higher aggregate performance score, 911.1% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 14 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 700% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-330UM in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-330UM
Core i3-330UM
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 220
Ryzen 5 PRO 220

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 8 votes

Rate Core i3-330UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-330UM and Ryzen 5 PRO 220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.