EPYC 7601 vs i3-330UM

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-330UM
2010
2 cores / 4 threads, 18 Watt
0.35
EPYC 7601
2017
32 cores / 64 threads, 180 Watt
20.94
+5883%

EPYC 7601 outperforms Core i3-330UM by a whopping 5883% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-330UM and EPYC 7601 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3064266
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.62
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD EPYC
Power efficiency1.8411.02
Architecture codenameArrandale (2010−2011)Naples (2017−2018)
Release date24 May 2010 (14 years ago)29 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$4,200

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-330UM and EPYC 7601 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed1.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 1.0no data
Bus rate1 × 2.5 GT/sno data
Multiplier922
L1 cache128 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size81+114 mm2192 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors382+177 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-330UM and EPYC 7601 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketBGA1288TR4
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-330UM and EPYC 7601. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-330UM and EPYC 7601 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-330UM and EPYC 7601 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-330UM and EPYC 7601. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB2 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth12.799 GB/s170.671 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel Processorsno data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency500 MHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-330UM and EPYC 7601 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-330UM and EPYC 7601.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-330UM 0.35
EPYC 7601 20.94
+5883%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-330UM 555
EPYC 7601 33255
+5892%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-330UM 189
EPYC 7601 792
+319%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-330UM 422
EPYC 7601 7699
+1724%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 20.94
Recency 24 May 2010 29 June 2017
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 180 Watt

i3-330UM has 900% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7601, on the other hand, has a 5882.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7601 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-330UM in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-330UM is a notebook processor while EPYC 7601 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-330UM and EPYC 7601, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-330UM
Core i3-330UM
AMD EPYC 7601
EPYC 7601

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 7 votes

Rate Core i3-330UM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 25 votes

Rate EPYC 7601 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-330UM or EPYC 7601, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.