A10-9620P vs i3-3245

Place in the ranking	2138	2088
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	no data	Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency	2.57	10.09
Architecture codename	no data	Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date	1 April 2013 (11 years ago)	1 January 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3245 and A10-9620P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	4	4
Base clock speed	3.4 GHz	2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed	no data	3.4 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
L2 cache	no data	2 MB
L3 cache	3 MB Intel® Smart Cache	no data
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Die size	no data	250 mm²
Maximum core temperature	65 °C	90 °C
Number of transistors	no data	3100 Million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3245 and A10-9620P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FCLGA1155	FP4
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3245 and A10-9620P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
My WiFi	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
FDI	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3245 and A10-9620P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	-	no data
Identity Protection	+	-
Anti-Theft	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3245 and A10-9620P are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3245 and A10-9620P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600	DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 4000	AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	no data
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3245 and A10-9620P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3245 and A10-9620P.

PCIe version

2.0

no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3245 1.55

A10-9620P 1.66
+7.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3245 2379

A10-9620P 2535
+6.6%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-3245 518
+3.2%

A10-9620P 502

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-3245 1177
+5.9%

A10-9620P 1111

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.55	1.66
Integrated graphics card	1.18	2.43
Recency	1 April 2013	1 January 2017
Physical cores	2	4
Chip lithography	22 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	15 Watt

i3-3245 has a 27.3% more advanced lithography process.

A10-9620P, on the other hand, has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, 105.9% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and 266.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-3245 and A10-9620P.

Note that Core i3-3245 is a desktop processor while A10-9620P is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3245 and A10-9620P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.