Pentium J4205 vs Core i3-3240
Aggregated performance score
Pentium J4205 outperforms Core i3-3240 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary Details
Comparing Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2033 | 1993 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation | 2.62 | 0.75 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Pentium |
| Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| Release date | 3 September 2012 (11 years ago) | 30 August 2016 (7 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $75 | $161 |
| Current price | $77 (1x MSRP) | $110 (0.7x MSRP) |
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-3240 has 249% better value for money than Pentium J4205.
Detailed Specifications
Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 94 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 65 °C | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 65 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1155 | FCBGA1296 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| My WiFi | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| SIPP | no data | - |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Smart Connect | no data | - |
| FDI | + | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| HD Audio | no data | + |
| RST | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Boot | no data | + |
| Secure Key | - | + |
| Identity Protection | + | + |
| OS Guard | no data | - |
| Anti-Theft | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | - | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | - | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel HD Graphics 2500 | Intel HD Graphics 505 |
| Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | + | + |
| Clear Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | + | + |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.05 GHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 18 |
| InTru 3D | + | - |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | no data | + |
| HDMI | no data | + |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | + |
| OpenGL | no data | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Pentium J4205 outperforms Core i3-3240 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Pentium J4205 outperforms Core i3-3240 by 5% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-3240 outperforms Pentium J4205 by 104% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Core i3-3240 outperforms Pentium J4205 by 57% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & Cons Summary
| Performance score | 1.50 | 1.57 |
| Integrated graphics card | 0.68 | 0.86 |
| Recency | 3 September 2012 | 30 August 2016 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Cost | $75 | $161 |
| Chip lithography | 22 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 55 Watt | 10 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3240 and Pentium J4205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
