Celeron M U3600 vs i3-3240

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2446not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.62no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron M
Power efficiency2.59no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Arrandale (2010−2011)
Release date3 September 2012 (13 years ago)18 December 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3240 and Celeron M U3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/s2500 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)2 MB
Chip lithography22 nm32 nm
Die size94 mm281+114 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data382+177 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3240 and Celeron M U3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt512 KB + 2 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron M U3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Core i3-3240 and Celeron M U3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron M U3600 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron M U3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3240 and Celeron M U3600 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3240 and Celeron M U3600.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 September 2012 18 December 2010
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 512 Watt

i3-3240 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 830.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Core i3-3240 and Intel Celeron M U3600. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core i3-3240 is a desktop processor while Celeron M U3600 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3240
Core i3-3240
Intel Celeron M U3600
Celeron M U3600

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1386 votes

Rate Core i3-3240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron M U3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-3240 and Celeron M U3600, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.