Celeron J4025 vs i3-3225

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	2208	2526
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.09	2.67
Market segment	Desktop processor	Desktop processor
Power efficiency	2.44	8.80
Architecture codename	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)	Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date	3 September 2012 (12 years ago)	4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$264	$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4025 has 2867% better value for money than i3-3225.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	2 (Dual-core)	2 (Dual-core)
Threads	4	2
Base clock speed	3.3 GHz	2 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.3 GHz	2.9 GHz
Bus rate	5 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	56 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	4 MB (shared)
L3 cache	3 MB (shared)	no data
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Die size	118 mm2	93 mm2
Maximum core temperature	no data	105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	65 °C	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA1155	Intel BGA 1090
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX	no data
AES-NI	-	+
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
My WiFi	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
Idle States	+	no data
Thermal Monitoring	+	-
FDI	+	no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
Secure Key	-	no data
Identity Protection	+	-
Anti-Theft	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.

VT-d	-	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum memory size	32 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card Compare	Intel HD Graphics 4000	Intel UHD Graphics 600 (250 - 700 MHz)
Quick Sync Video	+	-
Clear Video HD	+	no data
Graphics max frequency	1.05 GHz	no data
InTru 3D	+	no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported

3

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025.

PCIe version	2.0	2.0
PCI Express lanes	no data	6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	1.42	0.93
Integrated graphics card	1.18	0.87
Recency	3 September 2012	4 November 2019
Threads	4	2
Chip lithography	22 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	10 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---