Celeron J4025 vs i3-3225

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3225
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 55 Watt
1.41
+51.6%
Celeron J4025
2019
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.93

Core i3-3225 outperforms Celeron J4025 by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking22052511
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.062.56
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.438.80
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Gemini Lake Refresh (2019)
Release date3 September 2012 (12 years ago)4 November 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$264$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Celeron J4025 has 4167% better value for money than i3-3225.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.9 GHz
Bus rate5 GT/sno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)56 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB (shared)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography22 nm14 nm
Die size118 mm293 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXIntel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Smart Responseno data-
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
FDI+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Key-+
MPX-+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000Intel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHz700 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported33
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2160@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2160@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2160@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data6
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3225 1.41
+51.6%
Celeron J4025 0.93

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-3225 2239
+52%
Celeron J4025 1473

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-3225 535
+61.1%
Celeron J4025 332

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-3225 1135
+110%
Celeron J4025 540

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 0.93
Integrated graphics card 1.18 0.87
Recency 3 September 2012 4 November 2019
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 10 Watt

i3-3225 has a 51.6% higher aggregate performance score, 35.6% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more threads.

Celeron J4025, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 57.1% more advanced lithography process, and 450% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-3225 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4025 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3225 and Celeron J4025, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3225
Core i3-3225
Intel Celeron J4025
Celeron J4025

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 228 votes

Rate Core i3-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 125 votes

Rate Celeron J4025 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3225 or Celeron J4025, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.