Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 vs Core i3-3220

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i3-3220
2012
2 cores / 4 threads
1.46
+147%

Core i3-3220 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 by a whopping 147% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3220 and Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20642675
Place by popularity58not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.22no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3 (Desktop)2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Toledo (2006)
Release date3 September 2012 (11 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$117no data
Current price$59 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3220 and Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus supportno data1000 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache3 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography22 nm90 nm
Die size94 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3220 and Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1155no data
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt110 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3220 and Athlon 64 X2 FX-60. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI-no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
FDI+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-3220 and Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key-no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3220 and Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3220 and Athlon 64 X2 FX-60. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2500no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.05 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3220 and Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3220 and Athlon 64 X2 FX-60.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3220 1.46
+147%
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 0.59

Core i3-3220 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 by 147% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

i3-3220 4019
+105%
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 1960

Core i3-3220 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 by 105% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 0.59
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 22 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 110 Watt

The Core i3-3220 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3220 and Athlon 64 X2 FX-60, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3220
Core i3-3220
AMD Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 1965 votes

Rate Core i3-3220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.2 110 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3220 or Athlon 64 X2 FX-60, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.