Trace: try redirect_from
Trace: select _id, title from ss_cpu where redirect_to=6102
Processor N100 vs i3-3217UE
Aggregate performance score
Processor N100 outperforms i3-3217UE by a whopping 274% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-3217UE and Processor N100 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 2501 | 1556 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | no data | Intel Alder Lake-N |
Architecture codename | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
Release date | 1 August 2012 (12 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $128 |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-3217UE and Processor N100 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 4 | 4 |
Base clock speed | no data | 0.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 6 MB |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
Die size | 118 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-3217UE and Processor N100 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | Intel BGA1023 | BGA1264 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3217UE and Processor N100. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core i3-3217UE and Processor N100 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3217UE and Processor N100 are enumerated here.
VT-d | no data | + |
VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3217UE and Processor N100. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | unknown Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 4000 | Intel UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3217UE and Processor N100.
PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | no data | 9 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.88 | 3.29 |
Recency | 1 August 2012 | 3 January 2023 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 22 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 17 Watt | 6 Watt |
Processor N100 has a 273.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores, a 120% more advanced lithography process, and 183.3% lower power consumption.
The Processor N100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3217UE in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3217UE and Processor N100, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.