Ryzen 5 7520U vs Core i3-3110M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-3110M
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
1.06
Ryzen 5 7520U
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 15 Watt
6.02
+468%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Core i3-3110M by a whopping 468% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-3110M and Ryzen 5 7520U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23301028
Place by popularitynot in top-1009
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020)
Architecture codenameIvy Bridge (2012−2013)Mendocino-U (Zen 2)
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data
Current price$184 (0.8x MSRP)no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-3110M and Ryzen 5 7520U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography22 nm6 nm
Die size118 mm2100 mm2
Maximum core temperature90C (PGA); 105C (BGA)no data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-3110M and Ryzen 5 7520U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023,FCPGA988FP6
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-3110M and Ryzen 5 7520U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXLPDDR5-5500 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, AES, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, SHA
AES-NI-+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-3110M and Ryzen 5 7520U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-3110M and Ryzen 5 7520U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-3110M and Ryzen 5 7520U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 4000AMD Radeon 610M
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-3110M and Ryzen 5 7520U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-3110M and Ryzen 5 7520U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes164

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-3110M 1.06
Ryzen 5 7520U 6.02
+468%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Core i3-3110M by 468% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-3110M 1636
Ryzen 5 7520U 9312
+469%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Core i3-3110M by 469% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-3110M 394
Ryzen 5 7520U 1209
+207%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Core i3-3110M by 207% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-3110M 813
Ryzen 5 7520U 3822
+370%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Core i3-3110M by 370% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-3110M 209
Ryzen 5 7520U 834
+299%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Core i3-3110M by 299% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

i3-3110M 82
Ryzen 5 7520U 169
+107%

Ryzen 5 7520U outperforms Core i3-3110M by 107% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.06 6.02
Integrated graphics card 1.17 2.86
Recency 1 June 2012 20 September 2022
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 22 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

The Ryzen 5 7520U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-3110M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-3110M and Ryzen 5 7520U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-3110M
Core i3-3110M
AMD Ryzen 5 7520U
Ryzen 5 7520U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 718 votes

Rate Core i3-3110M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1113 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 7520U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-3110M or Ryzen 5 7520U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.