Celeron G4900 vs i3-2377M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2377M
2012
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.53
Celeron G4900
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.51
+185%

Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i3-2377M by a whopping 185% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2377M and Celeron G4900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28702153
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.95
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3Intel Celeron
Power efficiency2.952.80
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date1 September 2012 (12 years ago)3 April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$250$42

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2377M and Celeron G4900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed1.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier1531
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors624 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2377M and Celeron G4900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA10231151
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2377M and Celeron G4900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXno data
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data

Security technologies

Core i3-2377M and Celeron G4900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2377M and Celeron G4900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2377M and Celeron G4900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000 (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 610
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2377M and Celeron G4900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2377M and Celeron G4900.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2377M 0.53
Celeron G4900 1.51
+185%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2377M 838
Celeron G4900 2397
+186%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-2377M 245
Celeron G4900 607
+148%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-2377M 501
Celeron G4900 1033
+106%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 1.51
Integrated graphics card 0.66 1.89
Recency 1 September 2012 3 April 2018
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 51 Watt

i3-2377M has 100% more threads, and 200% lower power consumption.

Celeron G4900, on the other hand, has a 184.9% higher aggregate performance score, 186.4% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

The Celeron G4900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2377M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-2377M is a notebook processor while Celeron G4900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2377M and Celeron G4900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2377M
Core i3-2377M
Intel Celeron G4900
Celeron G4900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 25 votes

Rate Core i3-2377M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 116 votes

Rate Celeron G4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2377M or Celeron G4900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.