Core i7-10700F vs Core i3-2365M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2365M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 17 Watt
0.53
Core i7-10700F
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
10.62
+1904%

i7-10700F outperforms i3-2365M by a whopping 1904% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2365M and Core i7-10700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2749684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data29.28
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core i3no data
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Comet Lake (2020)
Release date27 June 2011 (13 years ago)30 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data
Current price$319 (1.4x MSRP)$210

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2365M and Core i7-10700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads416
Base clock speed1.4 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache128 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors624 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2365M and Core i7-10700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1023FCLGA1200
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2365M and Core i7-10700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
FMA+no data
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSXno data-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPPno data-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core i3-2365M and Core i7-10700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2365M and Core i7-10700F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-d-+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2365M and Core i7-10700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size16 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s45.8 GB/s
ECC memory support--

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 3000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2365M and Core i7-10700F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2365M and Core i7-10700F.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1616

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2365M 0.53
i7-10700F 10.62
+1904%

Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i3-2365M by 1904% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-2365M 822
i7-10700F 16423
+1898%

Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i3-2365M by 1898% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-2365M 202
i7-10700F 1618
+701%

Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i3-2365M by 701% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

i3-2365M 435
i7-10700F 7260
+1569%

Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i3-2365M by 1569% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 10.62
Recency 27 June 2011 30 April 2020
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 4 16
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i7-10700F is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2365M in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-2365M is a notebook processor while Core i7-10700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2365M and Core i7-10700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2365M
Core i3-2365M
Intel Core i7-10700F
Core i7-10700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 24 votes

Rate Core i3-2365M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1016 votes

Rate Core i7-10700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2365M or Core i7-10700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.