Ryzen 3 2300U vs i3-2350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-2350M
2011
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
0.79
Ryzen 3 2300U
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.50
+343%

Ryzen 3 2300U outperforms Core i3-2350M by a whopping 343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2350M and Ryzen 3 2300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26271541
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core i3AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency2.1422.10
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Raven Ridge (2017−2018)
Release date1 October 2011 (13 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$225no data

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2350M and Ryzen 3 2300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 2.0no data
Bus rate4 × 5 GT/sno data
Multiplier2320
L1 cache64K (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB (shared)4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm14 nm
Die size149 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature85C (PGA); 100C (BGA)no data
Number of transistors624 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2350M and Ryzen 3 2300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1023,PPGA988FP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2350M and Ryzen 3 2300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVXXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
My WiFi+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Core i3-2350M and Ryzen 3 2300U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+-
Anti-Theft+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2350M and Ryzen 3 2300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2350M and Ryzen 3 2300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size16 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21.335 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel HD Graphics 3000AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.15 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2350M and Ryzen 3 2300U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
SDVO+no data
CRT+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2350M and Ryzen 3 2300U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes1612

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2350M 0.79
Ryzen 3 2300U 3.50
+343%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-2350M 1258
Ryzen 3 2300U 5560
+342%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

i3-2350M 334
Ryzen 3 2300U 800
+140%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

i3-2350M 662
Ryzen 3 2300U 2236
+238%

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

i3-2350M 2
Ryzen 3 2300U 4
+103%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

i3-2350M 196
Ryzen 3 2300U 423
+116%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

i3-2350M 79
Ryzen 3 2300U 79

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

i3-2350M 0.91
+15.2%
Ryzen 3 2300U 0.79

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 3.50
Integrated graphics card 0.66 3.04
Recency 1 October 2011 26 October 2017
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 2300U has a 343% higher aggregate performance score, 360.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 6 years, 100% more physical cores, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 2300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2350M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2350M and Ryzen 3 2300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2350M
Core i3-2350M
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U
Ryzen 3 2300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 581 vote

Rate Core i3-2350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 193 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2350M or Ryzen 3 2300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.