Celeron J4005 vs Core i3-2130
Aggregate performance score
i3-2130 outperforms Celeron J4005 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-2130 and Celeron J4005 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2214 | 2414 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.11 | 1.28 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) | Goldmont Plus (2017) |
| Release date | 4 September 2011 (12 years ago) | 11 December 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $123 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Celeron J4005 has 1064% better value for money than i3-2130.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-2130 and Celeron J4005 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 112 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 131 mm2 | 93 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 73 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 504 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-2130 and Celeron J4005 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | 1155 | Intel BGA 1090 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2130 and Celeron J4005. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Security technologies
Core i3-2130 and Celeron J4005 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2130 and Celeron J4005 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2130 and Celeron J4005. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | 38.397 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel HD 2000 | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2130 and Celeron J4005.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.32 | 1.00 |
| Recency | 4 September 2011 | 11 December 2017 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 10 Watt |
i3-2130 has a 32% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.
Celeron J4005, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 550% lower power consumption.
The Core i3-2130 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J4005 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2130 and Celeron J4005, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
