Athlon 64 FX-72 vs Core i3-2100T

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core i3-2100T
2011
2 cores / 4 threads
0.96

Athlon 64 FX-72 outperforms Core i3-2100T by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-2100T and Athlon 64 FX-72 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23762254
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.124.28
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameSandy Bridge (2011−2013)Windsor (2006−2009)
Release date20 February 2011 (13 years ago)November 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$180no data
Current price$28 (0.2x MSRP)$28

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 64 FX-72 has 3467% better value for money than i3-2100T.

Detailed specifications

Core i3-2100T and Athlon 64 FX-72 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache3 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm90 nm
Die size131 mm2235 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistors504 million227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-2100T and Athlon 64 FX-72 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1155F
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-2100T and Athlon 64 FX-72. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVXno data
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
FDI+no data
Fast Memory Access+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core i3-2100T and Athlon 64 FX-72 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data
Identity Protection+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-2100T and Athlon 64 FX-72 are enumerated here.

VT-d-no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-2100T and Athlon 64 FX-72. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel HD Graphics 2000no data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.1 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-2100T and Athlon 64 FX-72 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-2100T and Athlon 64 FX-72.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-2100T 0.96
Athlon 64 FX-72 1.16
+20.8%

Athlon 64 FX-72 outperforms Core i3-2100T by 21% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

i3-2100T 1488
Athlon 64 FX-72 1794
+20.6%

Athlon 64 FX-72 outperforms Core i3-2100T by 21% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 1.16
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

The Athlon 64 FX-72 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-2100T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-2100T and Athlon 64 FX-72, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-2100T
Core i3-2100T
AMD Athlon 64 FX-72
Athlon 64 FX-72

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 25 votes

Rate Core i3-2100T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 5 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-72 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-2100T or Athlon 64 FX-72, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.