Ryzen 3 7320C vs i3-13100TE
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-13100TE and Ryzen 3 7320C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1157 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 34.20 |
| Architecture codename | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-13100TE and Ryzen 3 7320C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Die size | 257 mm2 | 100 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-13100TE and Ryzen 3 7320C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1700 | FT6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-13100TE and Ryzen 3 7320C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-13100TE and Ryzen 3 7320C technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-13100TE and Ryzen 3 7320C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-13100TE and Ryzen 3 7320C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-13100TE and Ryzen 3 7320C.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 4 |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 4.16 | 2.85 |
| Recency | 4 January 2023 | 23 May 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
i3-13100TE has 46% faster integrated GPU.
Ryzen 3 7320C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 66.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-13100TE and Ryzen 3 7320C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-13100TE is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 7320C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-13100TE and Ryzen 3 7320C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
