EPYC 9354P vs i3-1215U
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 9354P outperforms Core i3-1215U by a whopping 600% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1029 | 39 |
| Place by popularity | 17 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 15.10 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | Intel Alder Lake-M | AMD EPYC |
| Power efficiency | 43.03 | 16.15 |
| Architecture codename | Alder Lake-U (2022) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 23 February 2022 (2 years ago) | 10 November 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,730 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 3.25 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 32.5 |
| L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 10 MB (shared) | 256 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Die size | no data | 8x 72 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 52,560 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | SP5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, DDR5 | DDR5-4800 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 6 TiB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 460.8 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel Processors | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.1 GHz | no data |
| Execution Units | 64 | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 4 | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12.1 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.82 | 47.77 |
| Recency | 23 February 2022 | 10 November 2022 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 32 |
| Threads | 8 | 64 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 280 Watt |
i3-1215U has 1766.7% lower power consumption.
EPYC 9354P, on the other hand, has a 600.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, and 433.3% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
The EPYC 9354P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i3-1215U in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i3-1215U is a notebook processor while EPYC 9354P is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-1215U and EPYC 9354P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
