PRO A10-8770 vs i3-12100F

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-12100F
2022
4 cores / 8 threads, 58 Watt
9.22
+294%

Core i3-12100F outperforms PRO A10-8770 by a whopping 294% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8541813
Place by popularity5not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency14.503.28
Architecture codenameAlder Lake-S (2022)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release dateJanuary 2022 (2 years ago)October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.8 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)no data
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm28 nm
Die size163 mm2250 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1700AM4
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth76.8 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
Switchable graphics-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-n/a

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770.

PCIe version5.0 and 4.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

i3-12100F 9.22
+294%
PRO A10-8770 2.34

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

i3-12100F 14108
+295%
PRO A10-8770 3574

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.22 2.34
Threads 8 4
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 65 Watt

i3-12100F has a 294% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and 12.1% lower power consumption.

The Core i3-12100F is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A10-8770 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-12100F and PRO A10-8770, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-12100F
Core i3-12100F
AMD PRO A10-8770
PRO A10-8770

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 7865 votes

Rate Core i3-12100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 115 votes

Rate PRO A10-8770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core i3-12100F or PRO A10-8770, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.