GX-224IJ vs i3-12100F
Primary details
Comparing Core i3-12100F and GX-224IJ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 868 | not rated |
Place by popularity | 5 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 14.47 | no data |
Architecture codename | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Prairie Falcon (2016−2018) |
Release date | January 2022 (2 years ago) | 23 February 2016 (8 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core i3-12100F and GX-224IJ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Performance-cores | 4 | no data |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
L1 cache | 80K (per core) | 160 KB |
L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1 MB (shared) |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | Intel 7 nm | 28 nm |
Die size | 163 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-12100F and GX-224IJ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1700 | FP4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 58 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-12100F and GX-224IJ. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-12100F and GX-224IJ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Secure Key | + | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-12100F and GX-224IJ are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-12100F and GX-224IJ. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Radeon R4E 3CU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-12100F and GX-224IJ.
PCIe version | 5.0 and 4.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 58 Watt | 10 Watt |
i3-12100F has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.
GX-224IJ, on the other hand, has 480% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core i3-12100F and GX-224IJ. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Core i3-12100F is a desktop processor while GX-224IJ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core i3-12100F and GX-224IJ, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.