Pro A10-8700B vs i3-1115GRE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-1115GRE
2020, $338
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.62
+111%

Core i3-1115GRE outperforms Pro A10-8700B by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19662554
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.74no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Carrizo
Power efficiency7.383.49
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020−2021)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date2 September 2020 (5 years ago)3 June 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$338no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i3-1115GRE and Pro A10-8700B basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.2 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2048 KB
L3 cache6 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm28 nm
Die size144 mm2no data
Number of transistorsno data3100 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-1115GRE and Pro A10-8700B compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA 1449FP4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Pro A10-8700B. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataHSA 1.0
AES-NI++
FMA-FMA4
AVX+AVX
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+
TrueAudio-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
Out-of-band client management-+
VirusProtect-+
RAID-+
HSA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Pro A10-8700B are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Pro A10-8700B. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, LPDDR4XDDR3/DDR3L-2133
Max memory channelsno data2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardUHD Graphics G4 48EUAMD Radeon R6 Graphics
iGPU core countno data6
จำนวนพาธไลน์no data384
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-1115GRE and Pro A10-8700B integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Pro A10-8700B integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Pro A10-8700B.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i3-1115GRE 2.62
+111%
Pro A10-8700B 1.24

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i3-1115GRE 4588
+112%
Samples: 10
Pro A10-8700B 2168
Samples: 170

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.62 1.24
Recency 2 September 2020 3 June 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

i3-1115GRE has a 111.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

Pro A10-8700B, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores.

The Intel Core i3-1115GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Pro A10-8700B in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-1115GRE
Core i3-1115GRE
AMD Pro A10-8700B
Pro A10-8700B

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Core i3-1115GRE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 60 votes

Rate Pro A10-8700B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-1115GRE and Pro A10-8700B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.