Celeron J4105 vs i3-1115GRE
Aggregate performance score
Core i3-1115GRE outperforms Celeron J4105 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1933 | 2296 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.90 | 0.36 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron |
| Power efficiency | 18.62 | 17.19 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) | Goldmont Plus (2017) |
| Release date | 2 September 2020 (5 years ago) | 11 December 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $338 | $107 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i3-1115GRE has 706% better value for money than Celeron J4105.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i3-1115GRE and Celeron J4105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Multiplier | no data | 15 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 56 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 4 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 144 mm2 | 93 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 105 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-1115GRE and Celeron J4105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1449 | FCBGA1090 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Celeron J4105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Smart Response | no data | - |
| GPIO | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | - |
Security technologies
Core i3-1115GRE and Celeron J4105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
| MPX | - | + |
| Identity Protection | - | + |
| SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® ME |
| OS Guard | no data | + |
| Anti-Theft | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Celeron J4105 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Celeron J4105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, LPDDR4X | DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 8 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 38.397 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | UHD Graphics G4 48EU | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Max video memory | no data | 8 GB |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 750 MHz |
| Execution Units | no data | 12 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Core i3-1115GRE and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
| eDP | no data | + |
| DisplayPort | - | + |
| HDMI | - | + |
| MIPI-DSI | no data | + |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | no data | + |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | no data | 12 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.4 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1115GRE and Celeron J4105.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | 6 |
| USB revision | no data | 2.0/3.0 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
| Integrated LAN | no data | - |
| UART | no data | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.60 | 1.60 |
| Recency | 2 September 2020 | 11 December 2017 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 10 Watt |
i3-1115GRE has a 62.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron J4105, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores, and 50% lower power consumption.
The Intel Core i3-1115GRE is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron J4105 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core i3-1115GRE is a notebook processor while Celeron J4105 is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
