Xeon 6737P vs i3-1115G4E

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core i3-1115G4E
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.96
Xeon 6737P
2025
32 cores / 64 threads, 270 Watt
45.07
+1423%

Xeon 6737P outperforms Core i3-1115G4E by a whopping 1423% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking183166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.07no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency8.407.10
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-U (2020−2021)no data
Release date2 September 2020 (5 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$285no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 6737P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads464
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache6 MB (shared)144 MB
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 3 nm
Die size144 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data82 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 6737P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketIntel BGA 1449FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt270 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 6737P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512, Intel® AMX
AES-NI++
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 6737P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 6737P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 6737P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4, LPDDR4XDDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardUHD Graphics G4 48EUno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 6737P.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes488

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

i3-1115G4E 2.96
Xeon 6737P 45.07
+1423%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

i3-1115G4E 5231
Samples: 15
Xeon 6737P 79634
+1422%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.96 45.07
Recency 2 September 2020 1 January 2025
Physical cores 2 32
Threads 4 64
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 270 Watt

i3-1115G4E has 1700% lower power consumption.

Xeon 6737P, on the other hand, has a 1422.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 1500% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6737P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i3-1115G4E in performance tests.

Be aware that Core i3-1115G4E is a notebook processor while Xeon 6737P is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core i3-1115G4E
Core i3-1115G4E
Intel Xeon 6737P
Xeon 6737P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Core i3-1115G4E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6737P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 6737P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.