Xeon 3.0 vs i3-1115G4E
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1874 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.80 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Power efficiency | 8.42 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake-U (2020−2021) | Irwindale (2004) |
| Release date | 2 September 2020 (5 years ago) | June 2004 (21 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $285 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 3.0 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 144 mm2 | 169 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 3.0 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1449 | 604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 135 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 3.0. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 3.0 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 3.0. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4, LPDDR4X | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | UHD Graphics G4 48EU | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core i3-1115G4E and Xeon 3.0.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 4 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 135 Watt |
i3-1115G4E has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Core i3-1115G4E and Intel Xeon 3.0. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core i3-1115G4E is a notebook processor while Xeon 3.0 is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
